SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
0 references·12 citing·31 second hop
Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences. (2017)Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Pro…When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning (2024)When intuitive Bayesians need…The Use of Visualizations to Improve Bayesian Reasoning: A Literature Review (2023)The Use of Visualizations to …Sensitivity to Evidential Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty (2022)Sensitivity to Evidential Dep…Reference Dependence in Bayesian Reasoning: Value Selection Bias, Congruence Effects, and Response Prompt Sensitivity (2022)Reference Dependence in Bayes…The influence of sample size on preferences from experience (2021)The influence of sample size …Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities (2020)Which cognitive individual di…What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses (2020)What facilitates Bayesian rea…Reference Dependence in Bayesian Reasoning (2019)Reference Dependence in Bayes…Reaching for the star ratings: A Bayesian-inspired account of how people use consumer ratings (2019)Reaching for the star ratings…Evidencing How Experience and Problem Format Affect Probabilistic Reasoning Through Interaction Analysis (2019)Evidencing How Experience and…Focusing on what matters: Restructuring the presentation of Bayesian reasoning problems. (2018)Focusing on what matters: Res…(Yet) Another chance for good reasoning? A commentary and reply on Pighin, Tentori, and Girotto (2017) (2017)(Yet) Another chance for good…Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty (1996)Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. (1998)Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: a matter of information structure and question form (2001)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices* (1981)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. (1955)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. (1972)The similarity-updating model of probability judgment and belief revision. (2021)How does explicit reliability guide choices? Effect of trustworthiness on choice and metacognition (2026)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. (1995)The need for cognition. (1982)Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? (2000)Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making (2005)The effect of the 1‐in‐X numerical format on choices (2023)Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999)The Journal of Mathematical Behavior (2019)Measuring people’s covariational reasoning in Bayesian situations (2023)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Toward a positive theory of consumer choice (1980)Probabilistic Representation Differences between Decisions from Description and Decisions from Experience (2024)A Simple Model of Herd Behavior (1992)Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental Health (2011)A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization (2012)Learning From Aggregated Opinion (2024)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning. (2017)Picture this: Making health insurance choices easier for those who need it (2024)Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness (1972)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Reaching for the star ratings: A Bayesian-inspired account of how people use consumer ratings18 cited
  • 2023The Use of Visualizations to Improve Bayesian Reasoning: A Literature Review14 cited
  • 2020What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses11 cited
  • 2020Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities10 cited
  • 2022Sensitivity to Evidential Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty9 cited
  • 2019Evidencing How Experience and Problem Format Affect Probabilistic Reasoning Through Interaction Analysis9 cited
  • 2021The influence of sample size on preferences from experience4 cited
  • 2018Focusing on what matters: Restructuring the presentation of Bayesian reasoning problems.4 cited
  • 2024When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning3 cited
  • 2017(Yet) Another chance for good reasoning? A commentary and reply on Pighin, Tentori, and Girotto (2017)3 cited
  • 2022Reference Dependence in Bayesian Reasoning: Value Selection Bias, Congruence Effects, and Response Prompt Sensitivity2 cited
  • 2019Reference Dependence in Bayesian Reasoning0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work