Learning styles of entrepreneurs in knowledge-intensive industries

Robert M. Gemmell

36 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Innovation and Knowledge Management Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore whether there is a prevalent entrepreneurial learning style trait associated with successful knowledge industry entrepreneurial practice. Design/methodology/approach The paper reviews prior entrepreneurship studies utilizing experiential learning theory and examines the learning style preferences of 168 knowledge industry entrepreneurs to deduce a hypothesized entrepreneurial learning style. The entrepreneur participants’ Kolb Learning Style Inventory scores are modeled to explore causal links to individual and firm level entrepreneurial success. Findings Preference for the Kolb Active Experimentation (AE) learning mode over Reflective Observation (RO) predicts adoption of a key entrepreneurial innovation behavior and significant entrepreneurial performance benefits. In contrast to published theories, the RO learning mode exhibits surprising negative effects on entrepreneurial performance. Data analysis also reveals that 90 percent of sampled co-founder/partners had at least one partner with the hypothesized entrepreneurial style. Research limitations/implications The study fills a major research gap in entrepreneurial learning literature by identifying learning style traits associated with entrepreneurial success. The study findings can also be used by educators, practitioners and investors to help identify, appraise and develop entrepreneurial talent. Originality/value The study provides novel insights into the learning styles of practicing technology entrepreneurs by establishing a significant preference within this community for the AE and Concrete Experience learning modes. The study illustrates the negative effects of the RO learning mode which has previously linked to successful entrepreneurial practice.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1983Experiential Learning : Experience as the Source of Learning and Development 1991Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning 1994A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation 1991Structural Equations with Latent Variables.2020Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis 1984Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers 1999Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.

Cited by

2021Team reflexivity, individual intellectual capital and employee innovative behavior: a multilevel moderated mediation 2023Absorptive capacity in entrepreneurial education: Rethinking the Kolb's experiential learning theory 2019Introduction: entrepreneurial trends meet entrepreneurial education 2021The effect of small business leaders' organisational mindfulness and social learning on opportunistic behaviour to survive the COVID-19 pandemic

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.