Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Value-Added Measures in Education: What Every Educator Needs to Know

1 references·15 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability542 cited

Cited by

2013The Random Assignment of Students Into Elementary Classrooms69 cited
2017Value-Added Models for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability: Commonsense Assumptions64 cited
2013Including Students With Disabilities and English Learners in Measures of Educator Effectiveness63 cited
2016An Empirical Test of Oklahoma's A-F School Grades.60 cited
2012Using Evidence for Teacher Education Program Improvement and Accountability57 cited
2020Putting teacher evaluation systems on the map: An overview of states' teacher evaluation systems post–Every Student Succeeds Act45 cited
2013Ecologies of education quality24 cited
2017Integrating Academic Press and Support by Increasing Student Ownership and Responsibility17 cited
2019Reframing conversations about teacher quality: school and district administrators’ perceptions of the validity, reliability, and justifiability of a new teacher evaluation system15 cited
2020The Word on the Street or the Number from the State? Government-Provided Information and Americans’ Opinions of Schools15 cited
2013Value-added models of teacher and school effectiveness in Ireland: wise or otherwise?14 cited
2020“Rational” Observational Systems of Educational Accountability and Reform9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021

Performativity, Datafication and the Techniques of Teacher Evaluation

6 cited

2012Houston, We Have a Problem: Studying the SAS Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS) from Teachers' Perspectives in the Houston Independent School District (HISD)6 cited

2020Performance rankings in education: Implications for policy and practice6 cited