SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What determines supportive behaviors following bereavement? A systematic review and call to action
16 references·3 citing·52 second hop
What determines supportive behaviors following bereavement? A systematic review and call to action (2017)What determines supportive behaviors foll…Who Needs Bereavement Support? A Population Based Survey of Bereavement Risk and Support Need (2015)Who Needs Bereavement Support…Hierarchies of Loss: A Critique of Disenfranchised Grief (2012)Hierarchies of Loss: A Critiq…WEIRD languages have misled us, too [Comment on Henrich et al.] (2010)WEIRD languages have misled u…The weirdest people in the world? (2010)The weirdest people in the wo…Predictors of Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2010)Predictors of Complicated Gri…Family and social networks after bereavement: experiences of support, change and isolation (2010)Family and social networks af…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews (2006)Guidance on the conduct of na…Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)Standard Quality Assessment C…Grief and social support after the death of a spouse (1999)Grief and social support afte…Treatment of complicated mourning (1993)Treatment of complicated mour…Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys (1991)Response strategies for copin…Social support for the bereaved: Recipients' and providers' perspectives on what is helpful. (1986)Social support for the bereav…Reactions to the parents of the child suicide: A study of social impressions. (1980)Reactions to the parents of t…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…The impact of bereavement support on wellbeing: a comparative study between Australia and Ireland (2020)The impact of bereavement sup…Matching response to need: What makes social networks fit for providing bereavement support? (2019)Matching response to need: Wh…Public stigma of prolonged grief disorder: An experimental study (2018)Public stigma of prolonged gr…The psychology of interpersonal relations. (1958)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1984)Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power (2009)Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It (2011)Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies (2012)Inventory of complicated grief: A scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss (1995)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11 (2009)Prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in adult bereavement: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Grief During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations for Palliative Care Providers (2020)The prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in bereaved individuals following unnatural losses: Systematic review and meta regression analysis (2020)Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation (1991)Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (2000)Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across NationsCulture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (Second Edition), by HofstedeGeert. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001 (2002)Most people are not WEIRD (2010)World happiness report [2012] (2013)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically (2002)Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals (2016)The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies (2018)Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis (2023)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. (1998)Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. (2004)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution (1982)Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. (1982)Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture (2014)oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments (2016)The varieties of grief experience (2001)Resilience to loss and chronic grief: A prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. (2002)Traumatic Loss and Major Disasters: Strengthening Family and Community Resilience (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,603 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
  • 2010The weirdest people in the world?13,780 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,228 cited
  • 2010WEIRD languages have misled us, too [Comment on Henrich et al.]4,076 cited
  • 1991Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys2,510 cited
  • 2004Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields1,748 cited
  • 2006Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews690 cited
  • 1993Treatment of complicated mourning683 cited
  • 2010Predictors of Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies655 cited
  • 1986Social support for the bereaved: Recipients' and providers' perspectives on what is helpful.534 cited
  • 2015Who Needs Bereavement Support? A Population Based Survey of Bereavement Risk and Support Need306 cited
  • 2010Family and social networks after bereavement: experiences of support, change and isolation147 cited
  • 2012Hierarchies of Loss: A Critique of Disenfranchised Grief120 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1999
Grief and social support after the death of a spouse
91 cited
  • 1980Reactions to the parents of the child suicide: A study of social impressions.83 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Public stigma of prolonged grief disorder: An experimental study59 cited
    • 2019Matching response to need: What makes social networks fit for providing bereavement support?54 cited
    • 2020The impact of bereavement support on wellbeing: a comparative study between Australia and Ireland53 cited