Parasites, ghosts and mutualists: a relational geography of microbes for global health

Jamie Lorimer

84 citations0/0 files storedTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Geographies of human-animal interactions Parasites and Host Interactions Zoonotic diseases and public health

Abstract

Scientific research on the microbiome offers an ecological model of the human, comprised of myriad forms of microbial life. The composition and dynamics of this human microbiome are increasingly implicated in discussions of health. Attention has focused on missing microbes and their links to a range of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Pathological dysbiosis is understood to result from both the excessive presence and the absence of microbes. Microbial declines have been indexed to modern hygiene and healthcare practices and there is a growing interest in the therapeutic use of beneficial microbes. This reappraisal of the salutary potential of microbes challenges the negative associations prevalent in health geography and the field of global health. This paper develops relational and multispecies approaches to health geography to examine situations of microbial excess, absence and controlled reintroduction. The analysis focuses on human relations with hookworms. Hookworms are animal members of the microbiome. They co‐evolved with humans, live in us and are understood to manage the human microbiome to enable immunological tolerance. Both the excessive presence and the absence of hookworms can be pathological. They are currently the subjects of concurrent, but spatially discrete, programmes to deworm and reworm a variegated world. Focusing on this seeming spatial paradox, the analysis examines three types of human–hookworm relation: the parasite, the ghost and the mutualist. The conclusion reflects on the implications of this analysis for the human and nonhuman subjects of global health and the microbiopolitics of prevalent forms of antibiotic and probiotic healthcare.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 84 citations exist upstream.

References

2016Staying with the Trouble 2015The Mushroom at the End of the World 2009Towards a common definition of global health 2010Animal capital: rendering life in biopolitical times 1989The pasteurization of France 2009The Origins of Sociable Life: Evolution After Science Studies 2010VIRAL CLOUDS: Becoming H5N1 in Indonesia 2012Biosecurity and the topologies of infected life: from borderlines to borderlands

Cited by

2019Matter beginning to matter: On posthumanist understandings of the vital emergence of health 2020Setting the agenda for social science research on the human microbiome 2018Health geographies II: The posthuman turn 2019Filthy Flourishing 2018Furthering post-human political ecologies 2021Experimental Science for the ‘Bananapocalypse’: Counter Politics in the Plantationocene 2019

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.