Microsoft Academic is one year old: the Phoenix is ready to leave the nestAnne-Wil K. Harzing, Satu Alakangas2017-06-26articleScientometrics46 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.scientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and InformationWeb visibility and informetricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.References2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison2012A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners2016Microsoft Academic: is the phoenix getting wings?2013hIa: an individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences2016Microsoft Academic (Search): a Phoenix arisen from the ashes?Cited by2021A new comparative citation analysis: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, and Web of Science2017Microsoft Academic: A multidisciplinary comparison of citation counts with Scopus and Mendeley for 29 journals2018Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis2017Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis2022Team formation and team impact: The balance between team freshness and repeat collaboration2017Does Microsoft Academic find early citations?2020An analysis of revising article processing charges for open access journals between 2018 and 2020