Another Meta-Analysis of the White Racial Identity Attitude Scale's Cronbach Alphas: Implications for Validity

Janet E. Helms

53 citations0/0 files storedMeasurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Social and Intergroup Psychology Racial and Ethnic Identity Research

Abstract

This article provides a meta-analysis of 38 studies of J. E. Helms and R. T. Carter's (1990) White Racial Identity Attitude Scale. Systematic measurement errors are implicated as influences on the measure's reliability and validity.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.

References

1904The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things 1985Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis 1991Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.1990Black and white racial identity: theory, research, and practice 1984Toward a Theoretical Explanation of the Effects of Race on Counseling A Black and White Model 1987Statistical Inference for Coefficient Alpha 1970Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures.1998Reliability Generalization: Exploring Variance in Measurement Error Affecting Score Reliability Across Studies

Cited by

2002Stability of the Reliability of LibQUAL+™ Scores: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Study

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.