SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Produção científica: avaliação da qualidade ou ficção contábil?
7 references·1 citing·39 second hop
Produção científica: avaliação da qualidade ou ficção contábil? (2013)Produção científica: avaliação da qualida…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change* (2011)Assessing the Impact of Plann…Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (2009)Philosophy and the Mirror of …Lost in publication: how measurement harms science (2008)Lost in publication: how meas…On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications (2007)On the validity of citation c…Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (1990)Objectivity, Relativism, and …Uma breve história de Cadernos de Saúde Pública (2015)Uma breve história de Caderno…Produção científica: avaliação da qualidade ou ficção contábil? (2013)The value of peer review (2014)Transparência e processo editorial: como é o trabalho das Editoras-chefes? (2022)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. (2014)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations (1975)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)The Scientific Wealth of Nations (1997)Can A mazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? (2015)Citation Context Analysis as a Method for Conducting Rigorous and Impactful Literature Reviews (2020)Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation (2021)Women Don't Ask (2003)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance (2006)Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings (2009)What price the building of world-class universities? Academic pressure faced by young lecturers at a research-centered University in China (2017)Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research (2018)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Response Sets and Test Validity (1946)Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design (1950)Reforms as experiments. (1969)How Teacher Evaluation Methods Matter for Accountability (2014)Law, Regulation, and the Business Climate: The Nature and Influence of the World Bank Doing Business Project (2015)The Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2018)Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (2005)How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature (2011)A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers (2019)On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One (1998)Brand Community (2001)On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 1990Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth1,094 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2009Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature295 cited
  • 2011Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change*147 cited
  • 2008Lost in publication: how measurement harms science127 cited
  • 2007On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications80 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Uma breve história de Cadernos de Saúde Pública8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work