Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?

13 references·5 citing·54 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing433 cited
2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
2010Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors224 cited
2013Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment171 cited
2015Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process163 cited
2013Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review103 cited
2014Retractions91 cited
2004Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics91 cited
2013Ethics in the Production and Dissemination of Management Research: Institutional Failure or Individual Fallibility?74 cited
2014Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study65 cited
2006Plagiarism in the Economics Profession: A Survey49 cited
2008Journal and author impact metrics: An editorial45 cited
2006A Game-Theoretic Model of Plagiarism33 cited

Cited by

2023Accommodating coercion: Authors, editors, and citations20 cited
2021Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited

2023Coercive Citation: Understanding the Problem and Working Toward a Solution7 cited

2020Should authors cite sources suggested by peer reviewers? Six antidotes for handling potentially coercive reviewer citation suggestions7 cited

2022On the shoulders of giants? Motives to cite in management research7 cited