SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance (2017)Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inan…Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims (2016)Forensic bitemark identificat…Error and its Meaning in Forensic Science (2013)Error and its Meaning in Fore…Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (2011)Reference Manual on Scientifi…Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences—Fact or fiction? (2010)Uniqueness in the forensic id…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Preferred reporting items for…Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2009)International Organization fo…Bite mark analysis in forensic routine case work (2006)Bite mark analysis in forensi…Quality Systems—Medical Devices—Particular Requirements for the Application of ISO 9001 (2004)Quality Systems—Medical Devic…Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Hierarchy of evidence: a fram…The scientific basis for human bitemark analyses – a critical review (2001)The scientific basis for huma…Comparison of bitemarks left in foodstuffs with models of the suspects' dentitions as a means of identifying a perpetrator. (2000)Comparison of bitemarks left …Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. (1979)Large sample variance of kapp…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Scanning electron microscopy in the investigation of bite marks in foodstuffs (1975)Scanning electron microscopy …A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Exploring the degrees of distortion in simulated human bite marks (2019)Exploring the degrees of dist…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Reliability of DSM-III-R Anxiety Disorder Categories (1993)Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for the classification of emotional disorders. (2001)Testing the Reliability of Frontal Sinuses in Positive Identification (2004)More than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification (2005)Sex prediction from the femur and hip bone using a sample of CT images from a Spanish population (2014)A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales (2017)A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach (2019)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica (2007)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology (2007)Considerations for addressing bias in artificial intelligence for health equity (2023)EM-DAT: the Emergency Events Database (2025)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance (2004)Validation of quantitative NMR (2005)Metrological and quality concepts in analytical chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 2021) (2021)A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis (2013)The evolution of violence risk assessment (2014)Likelihood Ratio as Weight of Forensic Evidence: A Closer Look (2017)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 2010Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement12,147 cited
  • 2009International Organization for Standardization (ISO)3,677 cited
  • 2004Quality Systems—Medical Devices—Particular Requirements for the Application of ISO 90012,696 cited
  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
  • 1979Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters.398 cited
  • 2011Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence171 cited
  • 2013Error and its Meaning in Forensic Science106 cited
  • 2001The scientific basis for human bitemark analyses – a critical review104 cited
  • 2010Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences—Fact or fiction?98 cited
  • 2016Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims64 cited
  • 2006Bite mark analysis in forensic routine case work35 cited
  • 1975Scanning electron microscopy in the investigation of bite marks in foodstuffs

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

26 cited
  • 2000Comparison of bitemarks left in foodstuffs with models of the suspects' dentitions as a means of identifying a perpetrator.25 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Exploring the degrees of distortion in simulated human bite marks15 cited