SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE) · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticlePolicy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE)

G. Dunn2017

Article2017

Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE)

G. Dunn · Matthew Laing

116 citations·0/0 files stored·Environmental Science & Policy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Research, Science, and Academia Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration Social Science and Policy Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 116 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches 2006Constructing grounded theory : a practical guide through qualitative analysis 2017Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches 2006Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis 2010Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy 2006Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature 2010Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges 2013Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces

Cited by

2021Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy 2019Principles for evaluating knowledge co-production in natural resource management: Incorporating decision-maker values 2021Institutional barriers to actionable science: Perspectives from decision support tool creators 2021

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018Mediating the science-policy interface: Insights from the urban water sector in Melbourne, Australiaarticle · 6 shared references 2016Blue skies and black boxes: The promise (and practice) of grounded theory in human resource management researcharticle · 4 shared references 2016Practical Qualitative Research Strategies: Training Interviewers and Codersarticle · 4 shared references 2019College Access, Success and Equity for Students on the Autism Spectrumarticle · 4 shared references 2017Are we Baby Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y? A qualitative inquiry into generation cohorts in Malaysiaarticle · 4 shared references 2021Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectivesarticle · 4 shared references

Details

Year2017

Typearticle

Published2017-07-10

VenueEnvironmental Science & Policy

ISSN-L1462-9011

Languageen

Citations116

Files0 public / 0

ShelfResearch, Science, and Academia

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.005

openalex_workW2736261303

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives

2018Mediating the science-policy interface: Insights from the urban water sector in Melbourne, Australia

2020A framework for implementing evidence in policymaking: Perspectives and phases of evidence evaluation in the science-policy interaction

2018Towards linking environmental law and science

2020The role of environmental managers in knowledge co-production: Insights from two case studies