Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE)

11 references·16 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches22,104 cited
2006Constructing grounded theory : a practical guide through qualitative analysis18,720 cited
2017Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches16,035 cited
2006Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis11,828 cited
2010Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy1,199 cited
2006Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature882 cited
2010Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges527 cited
2013Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces234 cited
2015Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces172 cited
2016Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service162 cited
2015Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science–policy interfaces: Challenges and opportunities132 cited

Cited by

2021Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy99 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019

Principles for evaluating knowledge co-production in natural resource management: Incorporating decision-maker values

44 cited

2021Institutional barriers to actionable science: Perspectives from decision support tool creators37 cited

2021Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives34 cited

2018Mediating the science-policy interface: Insights from the urban water sector in Melbourne, Australia33 cited

2020A framework for implementing evidence in policymaking: Perspectives and phases of evidence evaluation in the science-policy interaction32 cited

2018Towards linking environmental law and science25 cited

2020The role of environmental managers in knowledge co-production: Insights from two case studies23 cited

2018How policymakers’ demands for usable knowledge shape science-policy relations in environmental policy in Poland20 cited

2021Why citizen scientists volunteer: the influence of motivations, barriers, and perceived project relevancy on volunteer participation and retention from a novel experiment19 cited

2019Building sustainability in the Eastern Himalaya: linking evidence to action15 cited

2022Accommodating coexisting impact rationales in knowledge co-production: The case of the Natuurpact reflexive evaluation14 cited

2022Supporting the design of useful and relevant holistic frameworks for land use opportunity assessment for indigenous people14 cited

2024More than policy neutral: Justifying the power of science-policy interfaces through legitimacy12 cited

2023Drivers and barriers to knowledge exchange through an envisioned online platform for transdisciplinary research projects11 cited

2024Providing a comprehensive thematic review of the Science-Policy Interface (SPI): A probabilistic topic modeling approach10 cited