SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The limitations of using randomised controlled trials as a basis for developing treatment guidelines
7 references·2 citing·40 second hop
The limitations of using randomised controlled trials as a basis for developing treatment guidelines (2017)The limitations of using randomised contr…Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines (2016)Network meta-analyses should …External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Publication bias and clinical trials (1987)Publication bias and clinical…Expectancy in placebo-controlled trials of psychedelics: if so, so what? (2022)Expectancy in placebo-control…Five good reasons to be disappointed with randomized trials (2019)Five good reasons to be disap…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Annals of the American association of geographers (2016)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)The influence of mental fatigue on brain activity: Evidence from a systematic review with meta‐analyses (2020)The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta‐analytic evaluation of recent meta‐analyses (2022)Treatment of eating disorders: A systematic meta-review of meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (2022)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)New evidence pyramid (2016)Sample size, study length, and inadequate controls were the most common self-acknowledged limitations in manual therapy trials: A methodological review (2020)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Psychedelics (2016)Psilocybin-assisted therapy for depression: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of human studies (2023)Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1) (2005)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version) (2010)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 1987Publication bias and clinical trials715 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
  • 2016Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines202 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Expectancy in placebo-controlled trials of psychedelics: if so, so what?99 cited
  • 2019Five good reasons to be disappointed with randomized trials46 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work