A Cross-sectional Study of Engineering Identity During Undergraduate Education

Allison Godwin · Walter C. Lee

37 citations0/0 files storedASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Career Development and Diversity Engineering Education and Curriculum Development Science Education and Perceptions

Abstract

In this research paper, we explore engineering students' identity development across the four or more years of undergraduate engineering education.The focus of this work is subject-related role identities, or how students position themselves and are positioned by others as the kind of people that engage in engineering, mathematics, or physics.We collected responses from 586 engineering students at a large, public East Coast university using an electronic survey during the spring semester of 2016.Survey items were taken from previously developed instruments and included measures of students' interest in engineering, students' feeling of recognition by others as an engineer, and students' beliefs about their performance/competence in engineering.We also measured students' overall attitudes about their identities as a physics person, math person, and engineer.Student responses were compared by academic year at the university (i.e., first year, second year, third year, or fourth or more year) using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's HSD for significant results.Our findings illustrate differences in students' engineering performance/competence and recognition beliefs as well as differences in their engineering, mathematics, physics overall identity measures.The post-hoc Tukey's HSD tests reveal a consistent pattern of identity development with lower identification in the second year of engineering education and identification progressing to the highest levels in the fourth year.This research provides evidence that these subject-related role identity measures can be used with students across undergraduate engineering and that they can differentiate among students by year at a university.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.1999Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.1994Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance 1996The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.2008National Center for Education Statistics 1997Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences 1992A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model 1956Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education.

Cited by

2021Engineering students’ attitudinal beliefs by gender and student division: a methodological comparison of changes over time 2020Gender and Engineering Identity among Upper-Division Undergraduate Students

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.