Stereotype Threat Effects on Older Adults’ Episodic and Working Memory: A Meta-Analysis

Bonnie Andrea Armstrong · Sara Nicole Gallant · Lingqian Li · Khushi Patel · Brenda Iok Wong

88 citations0/0 files storedThe Gerontologist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Aging and Gerontology Research Social and Intergroup Psychology Memory Processes and Influences

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Prior research has shown that exposure to negative age-based stereotype threat (ST) can undermine older adults' memory performance. The objective of the current meta-analysis was to examine the reliability and magnitude of ST effects on older adults' episodic and working memory performance-two forms of memory that typically show the greatest age-related declines. In addition, we examined potential moderators of age-based ST including type of ST manipulation, type and timing of memory task, participant age and education level. Research Design and Method: A total of 23 samples for episodic memory and 15 samples for working memory were derived from 19 published and 4 unpublished articles and analyzed in two separate meta-analyses. Results: Analyses revealed a reliable effect of ST on both older adults' episodic (d = 0.373) and working memory performance (d = 0.253). Interestingly, the age-based ST effect was only significant when blatant ST manipulations were used with episodic memory tasks or when subtle ST manipulations were used with working memory tasks. Moreover, within episodic memory, the ST effect only reached significance for recall but not cued-recall or recognition performance, and for immediate but not delayed tests of memory. Neither age nor level of education moderated the association between ST and older adults' memory performance. Discussion and Implications: These results highlight the vulnerability of both older adults' episodic and working memory performance to age-based ST. When measuring older adults' memory performance in a research context, we must therefore be wary of exposing participants to common stereotypes about aging and memory.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 88 citations exist upstream.

References

1995Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.1997A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.1995Writing meta-analytic reviews.2005This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype 1996Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping.2015A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage.2003The Impact of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Memory Performance 2009The stereotype-matching effect: Greater influence on functioning when age stereotypes correspond to outcomes.

Cited by

2020The applied implications of age-based stereotype threat for older adults.2021The ironic effect of older adults’ increased task motivation: Implications for neurocognitive aging 2020Feeling Out of Place: Internalized Age Stereotypes Are Associated With Older Employees’ Sense of Belonging and Social Motivation 2020Old Age-Related Stereotypes of Preschool Children 2021Do age stereotype‐based interventions affect health‐related outcomes in older adults? A systematic review and future directions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.