SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
New web services that help authors choose journals
12 references·3 citing·55 second hop
New web services that help authors choose journals (2017)New web services that help authors choose…What Motivates Authors of Scholarly Articles? The Importance of Journal Attributes and Potential Audience on Publication Choice (2016)What Motivates Authors of Sch…Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals (2016)Peer Review Quality and Trans…Where Should I Send It? Optimizing the Submission Decision Process (2015)Where Should I Send It? Optim…How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences (2014)How scholars implement trust …Turning good research into good publications (2013)Turning good research into go…What Journal Authors Want: Ten Years of Results from Elsevier's Author Feedback Programme (2011)What Journal Authors Want: Te…Perceived value of scholarly articles (2011)Perceived value of scholarly …Publishing in Open Access Education Journals: The Authors’ Perspectives (2010)Publishing in Open Access Edu…Scholarly Publishing (2009)Scholarly PublishingBenchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint (2006)Benchmarking scientific journ…Scholarly communication in the digital environment (2005)Scholarly communication in th…Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: author‐reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing (2002)Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: author…Choosing the ‘right’ journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic‐era early career researchers (2022)Choosing the ‘right’ journal …Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach (2019)Issues with criteria to creat…Comunicar: calidad, visibilización e impacto (2018)Comunicar: calidad, visibiliz…Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Communication: the Essence of Science (1979)Do Younger Researchers Assess Trustworthiness Differently when Deciding what to Read and Cite and where to Publish? (2015)Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article (2019)Attitudes of North American Academics toward Open Access Scholarly Journals (2020)Public Knowledge—The Social Dimension of Science (1968)Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. (1973)Self‐archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences (2006)Rhetoric of Science (2008)Scholarly communication in transition: The use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966–2005 (2009)What makes a ‘good’ title and (how) does it matter for citations? A review and general model of article title attributes in management science (2016)The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies (2004)The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006)Open Access Publishing in Business Research: The Authors’ Perspective (2011)Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) (2012)Adopting open access in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from a developing nation (2020)How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study (2020)Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations (2002)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis (2015)Academics’ attitudes towards peer review in scholarly journals and the effect of role and discipline (2017)The Value of a Finance Journal Publication (1998)‘WHAT AUTHORS WANT’: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals (1999)Open access self-archiving: An author study (2005)Author perceptions of journal quality (2008)A Method for Comparing Scholarly Journals as Service Providers to Authors (2009)Interactions between journal attributes and authors' willingness to wait for editorial decisions (2012)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact (2013)How to Rank Journals (2016)Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey (2019)The top 100 most cited articles in rosacea: a bibliometric analysis (2020)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19 (2022)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers (2020)More journal articles and fewer books: Publication practices in the social sciences in the 2010’s (2022)Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors (2005)Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis (2005)The missing link: journal usage metrics (2007)Seeking Impact and Visibility (2014)The correspondence of Henry Oldenburg (1971)The Economics of Electronic Journals (1997)The growth and number of journals (2003)Scholarly Communication: A Long View (2010)Policies on artificial intelligence chatbots among academic publishers: a cross-sectional audit (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals166 cited
  • 2002Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: author‐reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing96 cited
  • 2016What Motivates Authors of Scholarly Articles? The Importance of Journal Attributes and Potential Audience on Publication Choice77 cited
  • 2005Scholarly communication in the digital environment71 cited
  • 2009Scholarly Publishing58 cited
  • 2015Where Should I Send It? Optimizing the Submission Decision Process52 cited
  • 2014How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences51 cited
  • 2006Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint44 cited
  • 2011What Journal Authors Want: Ten Years of Results from Elsevier's Author Feedback Programme42 cited
  • 2010Publishing in Open Access Education Journals: The Authors’ Perspectives39 cited
  • 2013Turning good research into good publications27 cited
  • 2011Perceived value of scholarly articles27 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach28 cited
  • 2022Choosing the ‘right’ journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic‐era early career researchers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2018Comunicar: calidad, visibilización e impacto9 cited