Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance

R.P. Jayani Rajapathirana

1,038 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Innovation & Knowledge

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Business Strategies and Innovation Firm Innovation and Growth

Abstract

Insurers are well versed in the litany of challenging conditions facing the sector. These challenges are economic, political, regulatory, legal, social, and technological. As a result of those pressures, the industry is experiencing increasing competition, muted growth, and an excess of capital. The increased connectivity among household and workplace devices, the development of autonomous vehicle and the rising threat of cyber attacks are transforming the way people live and risk they need to mitigate with insurance products. Insurers need to adopt their business models address the changes which can be threatening to the growth of the industry ( Deloitte, 2017 ). Innovation is widely regarded as pinnacle success factor in highly competitive and global economy. An innovation perspective draws a clear picture of future opportunities that lie ahead. The main purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship among innovations capability, innovation type and on the different aspect of firm performance including innovation, market and financial performance based on an empirical study covering insurance industry in Sri Lanka. The research framework developed in this study was tested 379 senior managers of insurance companies. The empirical verification of assumption of this model has given evidence to confirm the relationship between innovation capabilities; innovation efforts and firm performance are significant and strong. The results of this study could lead effective management of innovation capability which helps to deliver more effective innovations outcomes to generate better performance and it would be benefits for management of the insurance companies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,038 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1990The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability 1990The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability 1986Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches 1984Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit 1994SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality 1998Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?

Cited by

2019Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization 2019Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation 2019The evolution of the financial technology ecosystem: An introduction and agenda for future research on disruptive innovations in ecosystems

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.