SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Support Science by Publishing in Scientific Society Journals
6 references·4 citing·44 second hop
Support Science by Publishing in Scientific Society Journals (2017)Support Science by Publishing in Scientif…Open-access mega-journals (2017)Open-access mega-journalsOpen-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile (2016)Open-Access Mega-Journals: A …The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance (2015)Impacted Science: Impact Is N…Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania (2014)Causes for the Persistence of…The history of the peer-review process (2002)The history of the peer-revie…The changing roles of scientific journals (2024)The changing roles of scienti…Ethical Publishing: How Do We Get There? (2022)Ethical Publishing: How Do We…Pediatric Surgical Research Output in Germany in the Last 30 Years – An Assessment and International Comparison of Three Dedicated Paediatric Surgical Journals (2020)Pediatric Surgical Research O…Publication incentives based on journal rankings disadvantage local publications (2018)Publication incentives based …Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science? (2015)The Impact Factor Fallacy (2018)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Anatomy of green open access (2013)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals (2018)The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network (2018)The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network (2018)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Knowledge production from an African perspective: International information flows and intellectual property (2005)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)The darker side of quantitative academic performance metrics (2019)Bibliometrics to assess the productivity and impact of medical research (2021)Questioning Scientific Publications: Understanding how Indonesian Scholars Perceive the Obligation to Publish and its Ethical Practices (2023)Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)The credibility crisis and democratic governance: how to reform university governance to be compatible with the nature of science (2023)Over two decades of scientific misconduct in India: Retraction reasons and journal quality among inter-country and intra-country institutional collaboration (2024)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Misinformation in and about science (2021)A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences (2016)Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space (2019)Women Are Underrepresented and Receive Differential Outcomes at ASM Journals: a Six-Year Retrospective Analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
  • 2014Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania196 cited
  • 2017Open-access mega-journals138 cited
  • 2016Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile89 cited
  • 2015Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance66 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Publication incentives based on journal rankings disadvantage local publications20 cited
  • 2024The changing roles of scientific journals18 cited
  • 2022Ethical Publishing: How Do We Get There?15 cited
  • 2020Pediatric Surgical Research Output in Germany in the Last 30 Years – An Assessment and International Comparison of Three Dedicated Paediatric Surgical Journals8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work