Ethnographic understandings of ethnically diverse neighbourhoods to inform urban design practice

Clare Rishbeth · Farnaz Ganji · Goran Vodicka

48 citations0/0 files storedLocal Environment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban and sociocultural dynamics Urban Planning and Governance Place Attachment and Urban Studies

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to inform urban design practice through deeper understanding and analysis of the social dynamics of public outdoor space in ethnically diverse neighbourhoods. We hypothesise that findings from ethnographic research can provide a resource that improves cultural literacy and supports social justice in professional practice. The primary method is a meta-synthesis literature review of 24 ethnographic research papers, all of which explore some dimensions of public open space use and values in UK urban contexts characterised by ethnic and racial diversity. We summarise thematic understandings and significance of neighbourhood places of shared activity, parks, spaces of passing-by and of retreat. We evaluate the implications for intercultural social dynamics, exploring the spatial and temporal dimensions of conviviality and racism in public open space. We then argue that it is possible to develop principles for urban design practice informed by this work, and propose four for discussion: maximising straightforward participation, legitimising diversity of activity, designing in micro-retreats of nearby quietness and addressing structural inequalities of open space provision. We conclude that ethnographic research can provide detailed insights into the use of the public realm and also inform a more nuanced understanding of outdoor sociality relevant for an increasingly diverse society. The challenge is two-fold: for ethnographers to become less cautious in engaging with decisions and priorities regarding how cities change, and for urban designers to explicitly embed informed understandings of difference into their broad desire for inclusive public space.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community 1998Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions.2000Bowling alone 1975The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.2015The Death and Life of Great American Cities 2012Justice and the Politics of Difference 2007Super-diversity and its implications 1997Collaborative Planning

Cited by

2020Conviviality by design: the socio-spatial qualities of spaces of intercultural urban encounters 2021Leveraging built environment interventions to equitably promote health during and after COVID-19 in Toronto, Canada 2020Visibility as Justice: Immigrant Street Vendors and the Right to Difference in Rome 2021European public space projects with social cohesion in mind: symbolic, programmatic and minimalist approaches 2022The impact of perceived racism on walking behavior during the COVID-19 lockdown 2023Geographies of Encounter, Public Space, and Social Cohesion: Reviewing Knowledge at the Intersection of Social Sciences and Built Environment Disciplines

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.