Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The 2016 Wines of Portugal Challenge: general implications of more than 8400 wine-score observations

11 references·4 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1951Social Choice and Individual Values.7,792 cited
1952Social Choice and Individual Values1,762 cited
1977The choice axiom after twenty years555 cited
2008An Examination of Judge Reliability at a major U.S. Wine Competition146 cited
2014Analyses of Wine-Tasting Data: A Tutorial34 cited
2015Evaluating Wine-Tasting Results and Randomness with a Mixture of Rank Preference Models23 cited
1997The evaluation of judges at wine competitions: the application of Eggshell plots23 cited
2015Seeking the Veritas about the Vino: fine wine ratings as wine knowledge19 cited
2014Quantifying Randomness Versus Consensus in Wine Quality Ratings18 cited
2012804 Tastes: Evidence on Preferences, Randomness, and Value from Double-Blind Wine Tastings15 cited
2009The role and influence of wine awards as perceived by the South African wine consumers12 cited

Cited by

2018Do Female and Male Judges Assign the Same Ratings to the Same Wines? Large Sample Results7 cited
2022Stochastic error and biases remain in blind wine ratings5 cited
2022A maximum entropy estimate of uncertainty about a wine rating4 cited
2024Explaining wine scores through stochastic frontier analysis. An intent to measure sensory non-observable attributes

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2 cited