Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Academics’ attitudes towards peer review in scholarly journals and the effect of role and discipline

10 references·5 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Bias in peer review997 cited
2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
2014Peer review: still king in the digital age243 cited
2017Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals107 cited
2014Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: setting the scene for a major study79 cited
2015Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire75 cited
2011Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing68 cited
2015Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach57 cited
2014How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences51 cited

Cited by

2023Distrust in grant peer review—reasons and remedies19 cited
2021Which peer reviewers voluntarily reveal their identity to authors? Insights into the consequences of open-identities peer review17 cited
2019Ambiguity in identification of peer-reviewed publications in the Finnish and Flemish performance-based research funding systems12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019The art of peer reviewing: Toward an effective developmental process11 cited

2021Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review1 cited