SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research
13 references·16 citing·42 second hop
Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research (2017)Authorship and citation manipulation in a…Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Publishing: The peer-review s…The Altmetrics Collection (2012)The Altmetrics CollectionPredatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)Coercive Citation in Academic…Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Honorary and ghost authorship…GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS THROUGH PROBLEMATIZATION. (2011)GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS…A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)A Systematic Review of Resear…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists (2007)What Do Mentoring and Trainin…The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships (2007)The Perverse Effects of Compe…The number that's devouring science (2005)The number that's devouring s…Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Prevalence of Articles With H…When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)When authorship fails. A prop…An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication (2022)An Ethical Exploration of Inc…Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers (2021)Questionable Research Practic…Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration (2021)Gender-based homophily in res…A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior (2021)A survey of biomedical journa…The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis (2020)The Landscape of Risk Communi…Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review (2020)Journal policies and editors’…Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology (2020)Integrity of clinical researc…How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess (2020)How much is too much? The dif…The influence of editorial decisions and the academic network on self-citations and journal impact factors (2019)The influence of editorial de…Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholar…Scientometrics Recent Advances (2019)Scientometrics Recent AdvancesRethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal (2019)Rethinking impact factors: be…Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia (2019)Games academics play and thei…Ten simple rules for responsible referencing (2018)Ten simple rules for responsi…Assessment of Women Physicians Among Authors of Perspective-Type Articles Published in High-Impact Pediatric Journals (2018)Assessment of Women Physician…Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Academic Misconduct, Misrepre…How to do a meta‐analysis (2010)The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) (2016)Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals (2018)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)The politics of publication (2003)Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research (2012)Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Coauthorship within the United States (2015)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (1978)Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (1996)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)Generating Theory by Abduction (2021)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems (1985)The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property (1988)Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure (2013)Scholarly Impact: A Pluralist Conceptualization (2014)The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2011GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS THROUGH PROBLEMATIZATION.1,583 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
  • 1998Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals553 cited
  • 2011Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey477 cited
  • 2012Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing433 cited
  • 2011A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines394 cited
  • 2007The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships383 cited
  • 2012The Altmetrics Collection280 cited
  • 2007What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists269 cited
  • 2005The number that's devouring science243 cited
  • 2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

133 cited
  • 2018Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment130 cited
  • 2019Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing128 cited
  • 2018Assessment of Women Physicians Among Authors of Perspective-Type Articles Published in High-Impact Pediatric Journals121 cited
  • 2020How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess116 cited
  • 2021Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration116 cited
  • 2019Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal87 cited
  • 2021A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior74 cited
  • 2020Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review73 cited
  • 2018Ten simple rules for responsible referencing71 cited
  • 2020The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis65 cited
  • 2019The influence of editorial decisions and the academic network on self-citations and journal impact factors52 cited
  • 2022An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication50 cited
  • 2020Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology46 cited
  • 2021Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers45 cited
  • 2019Scientometrics Recent Advances44 cited