SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it?
1 references·3 citing·12 second hop
Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it? (2018)Peer review in scholarly publishing part …The essential role of peer review (2001)The essential role of peer re…Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process (2025)Paying reviewers and regulati…Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg? (2024)Emerging plagiarism in peer-r…Reviewing Peer Review: A Flawed System: With Immense Potential (2023)Reviewing Peer Review: A Flaw…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Do you want your paper published? – Then referee others! The view from seasoned editors (2024)Is Peer Review Censorship? (2009)Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data (2015)How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The essential role of peer review43 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg?18 cited
  • 2023Reviewing Peer Review: A Flawed System: With Immense Potential11 cited
  • 2025Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work