"Ideas about Human Possibilities": Connecticut's PA 12-40 and Basic Writing in the Era of Neoliberalism

Abstract

David Bleich's exploration of language conflicts in the university inThe Materiality of Language: Gender, Politics, and the University helps explain the ongoing struggle over basic writing as between two radically different understandings of language.Progressive educators and writing teachers see language as rhetorical and contextual, "material" in Bleich's terms.Policy makers, large-scale writing assessment designers, and public discourse generally see language as ahistorical and decontextualized, involving ladders of skills to be mastered, or "sacralized."This article examines the struggle between these materialist innovations and repressive policy mandates and assessments as a manifestation of this root struggle over language.The ongoing nature of this struggle, having occurred in this country for over a century, means progressive programs must maintain a stance of constant vigilance, innovation, and subversion.The outcome critically affects efforts to increase access to higher education.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.