SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to critically appraise a paper
5 references·0 citing·25 second hop
How to critically appraise a paper (2018)How to critically appraise a paperThe Consort (Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials) (2017)The Consort (Consolidated Sta…Improving the quality of reporting in veterinary journals: How far do we need to go with reporting guidelines? (2010)Improving the quality of repo…How to critically appraise an article (2009)How to critically appraise an…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence (2003)Effect of interpretive bias o…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The ARRIVE guidelines: A resource for authors and reviewers to ensure that submissions to The Veterinary Journal meet minimal expectations of completeness, accuracy and transparency (2011)Reporting guidelines: How can they be implemented by veterinary journals? (2015)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1998)Return to Reason (2001)Scientific authorship (2004)Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective (2018)The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013)Dance for People With Parkinson Disease: What Is the Evidence Telling Us? (2014)What do people really think of generic medicines? A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature on stakeholder perceptions of generic drugs (2015)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)Clarity and brevity: writing an article for this Journal (2017)Endorsements of five reporting guidelines for biomedical research by journals of prominent publishers (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 2003Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence222 cited
  • 2009How to critically appraise an article178 cited
  • 2017The Consort (Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials)28 cited
  • 2010Improving the quality of reporting in veterinary journals: How far do we need to go with reporting guidelines?18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work