SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled
Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to …Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (2017)Empirical assessment of publi…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Impact factor: outdated artef…Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…Citation Statistics (2009)Citation StatisticsShow me the data (2007)Show me the dataLEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAE…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Impact factors can mislead (1996)Impact factors can misleadTowards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality (2024)Towards responsible research …Replacing academic journals (2023)Replacing academic journalsWhat makes the corporate social responsibility impact on Customer–Company identification stronger? A meta-analysis (2022)What makes the corporate soci…Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)Scientific Publishing in Biom…Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis (2022)Faculty appointment and promo…Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences (2022)Citation counts and journal i…The Democratisation Myth (2021)The Democratisation MythRequiem for impact factors and high publication charges (2021)Requiem for impact factors an…How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals (2021)How faculty define quality, p…Sorry, we’re open: Golden open-access and inequality in non-human biological sciences (2020)Sorry, we’re open: Golden ope…Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review (2020)Self-correction of science: a…Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high (2020)Are questionable research pra…A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship (2020)A tale of two 'opens': inters…Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholar…Reliable novelty: New should not trump true (2019)Reliable novelty: New should …The Impact Factor Fallacy (2018)The Impact Factor FallacyJournal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]" (2015)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2017Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature760 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2011Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?370 cited
  • 2005LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS359 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2009Citation Statistics285 cited
  • 2007Show me the data279 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1996Impact factors can mislead227 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing128 cited
    • 2022Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences123 cited
    • 2018The Impact Factor Fallacy96 cited
    • 2023Replacing academic journals54 cited
    • 2022Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals52 cited
    • 2020Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review51 cited
    • 2021Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges50 cited
    • 2021How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals49 cited
    • 2020Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high47 cited
    • 2022What makes the corporate social responsibility impact on Customer–Company identification stronger? A meta-analysis44 cited
    • 2020A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship43 cited
    • 2021The Democratisation Myth42 cited
    • 2019Reliable novelty: New should not trump true38 cited
    • 2020Sorry, we’re open: Golden open-access and inequality in non-human biological sciences38 cited
    • 2022Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis37 cited
    • 2024Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality33 cited