SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes
9 references·4 citing·46 second hop
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes (2018)Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses …The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)How to Read a Systematic Revi…The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)The nuts and bolts of PROSPER…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a review (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Towards a Methodology for Dev…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of T…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Investigate the relationship between the retraction reasons and the quality of methodology in non-Cochrane retracted systematic reviews: a systematic review (2024)Investigate the relationship …More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review (2021)More consideration is needed …COVID-19 meta-analyses: a scoping review and quality assessment (2021)COVID-19 meta-analyses: a sco…Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 1: exploring treatment effect and trustworthiness (2019)Should this systematic review…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)“Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI (2021)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis (2018)When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation (2019)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Collaborative Care for Depression (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? (2015)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Scientific Integrity and Misconduct—Yet Again (2021)Factors influencing independent travel of pre-driving adolescents through public transport: a systematic literature review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review15,354 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 1992Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction1,138 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 2014How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care454 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a review19 cited

Cited by

  • 2021More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review20 cited
  • 2024Investigate the relationship between the retraction reasons and the quality of methodology in non-Cochrane retracted systematic reviews: a systematic review14 cited
  • 2019Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 1: exploring treatment effect and trustworthiness11 cited
  • 2021COVID-19 meta-analyses: a scoping review and quality assessment

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

10 cited