SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparing Categorical and Probabilistic Fingerprint Evidence
9 references·1 citing·39 second hop
Comparing Categorical and Probabilistic Fingerprint Evidence (2018)Comparing Categorical and Probabilistic F…How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment (2013)How Jurors Evaluate Fingerpri…Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence? (2013)Do Jurors Give Appropriate We…Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power (2009)Instructional manipulation ch…Statistics in the Jury Box: How Jurors Respond to Mitochondrial DNA Match Probabilities (2007)Statistics in the Jury Box: H…Thinking About Low-Probability Events (2004)Thinking About Low-Probabilit…The Random Match Probability (RMP) in DNA Evidence: Irrelevant and Prejudicial? (1995)The Random Match Probability …Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Interpretation of statistical…Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process (1971)Trial by Mathematics: Precisi…The Utility of Expanded Conclusion Scales During Latent Print Examinations (2020)The Utility of Expanded Concl…Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. (1986)How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. (1995)The risk of surprise in energy technology costs (2007)If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony (2011)Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness (1972)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence (2019)Judges and forensic science education: A national survey (2021)Towards another paradigm for forensic science? (2021)Numeracy and Decision Making (2006)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Wrongful Convictions (2019)Toward a positive theory of consumer choice (1980)Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice (1985)Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination (2004)Investigating Variation in Replicability (2014)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles (2017)Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)New directions in attribution research (1976)Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? (1992)The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)The ‘Heuristics and Biases’ Bias in Expert Elicitation (2007)Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales (2008)Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Not all identification conclusions are equal: Quantifying the strength of fingerprint decisions (2023)The Influence of Identification Decision and DNA Evidence on Juror Decision Making1 (2009)Economic Analysis of Accident Law. (1989)Commensuration as a Social Process (1998)Brain imaging research on psychopathy: Implications for punishment, prediction, and treatment in youth and adults (2015)The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors’ recall and recognition of trial information (2015)Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt (2018)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power3,489 cited
  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 1971Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process616 cited
  • 1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
  • 2004Thinking About Low-Probability Events67 cited
  • 2013Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence?37 cited
  • 2013How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment37 cited
  • 2007Statistics in the Jury Box: How Jurors Respond to Mitochondrial DNA Match Probabilities32 cited
  • 1995The Random Match Probability (RMP) in DNA Evidence: Irrelevant and Prejudicial?23 cited

Cited by

  • 2020The Utility of Expanded Conclusion Scales During Latent Print Examinations15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work