Tell me if you can: time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding

Miha Škerlavaj, Catherine E. Connelly, Matej Černe, Anders Dysvik

2018-05-25articleJournal of Knowledge Management294 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Knowledge Management and Sharing Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Knowledge Management in Higher Education

Abstract

Purpose The belief that knowledge actually expands when it is shared has been deeply rooted in the mainstream knowledge management literature. Although many organizations and managers expect employees to share their knowledge with their colleagues, this does not always occur. This study aims to use the conservation of resources theory to explain why employees who experience greater time pressure are more likely to engage in knowledge hiding; it further considers how this behavior may be moderated by these employees’ prosocial motivation and perspective taking. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses quantitative multi-study research design as a combination of two-wave field study among 313 employees at an insurance company and a lab experimental study. Findings In the field study (Study 1), the authors find that perceived time pressure is positively related to knowledge hiding. Furthermore, this relationship is moderated by prosocial motivation: employees who perceive greater time pressure hide knowledge only when they are low in prosocial motivation. An experiment (Study 2) replicates these findings, and finds that perspective taking mediates the moderating effect of prosocial motivation on the relationship between time pressure and knowledge hiding. Research limitations/implications Despite its many contributions, the present research is also not without limitations. Study 1 was a cross-lagged sectional field study with self-reported data (although the two-wave design does help alleviate common-method-bias concerns). Causality concerns were further alleviated by using additional experimental study. Practical implications The paper highlights important reasons why people hide knowledge at work (because of experienced time pressure) as well as identifies two interlinked potential remedies (prosocial motivation and perspective taking) to reduce knowledge hiding. Originality/value This paper contributes to expanding nomological network of knowledge hiding construct by extending the set of known antecedents and contingencies.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 294 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.

2011Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It

1997The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation

1998Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know

1959Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy

1999The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits

2002Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation

1996Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work.

Cited by

2018Top-Down Knowledge Hiding in Organizations: An Empirical Study of the Consequences of Supervisor Knowledge Hiding Among Local and Foreign Workers in the Middle East

2020Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding

2021Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The moderating role of knowledge hiders and knowledge seekers in organizations

2018Leader‐signaled knowledge hiding: Effects on employees' job attitudes and empowerment

2021Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding