SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Writing a discussion section: how to integrate substantive and statistical expertise
8 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Writing a discussion section: how to integrate substantive and statistical expertise (2018)Writing a discussion section: how to inte…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…The function of the discussion section in academic medical writing (2000)The function of the discussio…The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers (1999)The case for structuring the …Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Bias, prevalence and kappaQuality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement (1996)Methodological Wishes for the Next Decade and How to Make Wishes Come True (2013)Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea (2020)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts (1975)The Manufacture of Knowledge (1981)Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Guidelines for Writing Manuscripts About Community-Based Participatory Research for Peer-Reviewed Journals (2007)Publishing research in a second language: The case of Sudanese contributors to international medical journals (2008)Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 1993Bias, prevalence and kappa2,175 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 1999The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers182 cited
  • 2000The function of the discussion section in academic medical writing68 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work