SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews

Neal Haddaway2018

Article2018

The role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews

Neal Haddaway · Biljana Macura

85 citations·0/0 files stored·Nature Climate Change

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews scientometrics and bibliometrics research Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 85 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references 2013An Introduction to Systematic Reviews 2006Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management

Cited by

2021Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies?2021Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments 2019Negative emissions and international climate goals—learning from and about mitigation scenarios 2022The rise of phase-out as a critical decarbonisation approach: a systematic review 2022

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2021Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extensionreview · 7 shared references 2018Predicting the time needed for environmental systematic reviews and systematic mapsreview · 5 shared references 2018Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policyreview · 5 shared references 2016A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciencesarticle · 4 shared references 2016Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological reviewreview · 4 shared references 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirementsreview · 4 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typearticle

Published2018-05-21

VenueNature Climate Change

ISSN-L1758-678X

Languageen

Citations85

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1038/s41558-018-0180-3

openalex_workW2804506005

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Methods for Financial Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects: A Review

2019Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options

2022Systematic reviews: A glossary for public health

2021Critical Analysis: The Often-Missing Step in Conducting Literature Review Research