Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews

13 references·14 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,700 cited
2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
2013An Introduction to Systematic Reviews1,235 cited
2006Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management1,136 cited
2018ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps944 cited
2006How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective860 cited
2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review768 cited
2016A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences766 cited
2015Poor methodological detail precludes experimental repeatability and hampers synthesis in ecology

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

87 cited

Cited by

2021Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies?260 cited
2021Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments236 cited
2019Negative emissions and international climate goals—learning from and about mitigation scenarios110 cited
2022The rise of phase-out as a critical decarbonisation approach: a systematic review67 cited
2022Methods for Financial Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects: A Review65 cited
2019Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options58 cited
2022Systematic reviews: A glossary for public health29 cited
2021Critical Analysis: The Often-Missing Step in Conducting Literature Review Research28 cited
2023Towards a Comprehensive Framework for the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Organizational Maturity on Business Continuity Program Management: A Systematic Literature Review26 cited
2024An Umbrella Review of Reporting Quality in CHI Systematic Reviews: Guiding Questions and Best Practices for HCI22 cited
2025Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews17 cited
2024Laser-based disassembly of end-of-life automotive traction batteries: A systematic patent analysis13 cited
2025Recommendations for producing knowledge syntheses to inform climate change assessments11 cited
2022Behavioural interventions change individual transport choices but have a limited impact on transport mode split. Evidence from a systematic review9 cited