SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cochrane acute respiratory infections group's stakeholder engagement project identified systematic review priority areas
6 references·0 citing·23 second hop
Cochrane acute respiratory infections group's stakeholder engagement project identified systematic review priority areas (2018)Cochrane acute respiratory infections gro…Cochrane Airways Group reviews were prioritized for updating using a pragmatic approach (2014)Cochrane Airways Group review…Evidence in agenda setting: new directions for the Cochrane Collaboration (2013)Evidence in agenda setting: n…The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics (2012)The Cochrane Collaboration re…Prevention and self-management interventions are top priorities for osteoarthritis systematic reviews (2012)Prevention and self-managemen…Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews (2012)Ensuring relevance for Cochra…A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice (2010)A checklist for health resear…Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health (2008)Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2010)The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas (2011)Evidence-based mapping of design heterogeneity prior to meta-analysis: a systematic review and evidence synthesis (2014)Using Intervention Mapping to Develop a Community-based Disease Self-management Support Program for Patients with Osteoarthritis (2015)A common framework of steps and criteria for prioritizing topics for evidence syntheses: a systematic review (2019)An equity lens can ensure an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane Reviews (2013)The Cochrane Library (2005)Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting (2009)Research-agenda bias (2018)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews (2013)The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples (2019)Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study (2020)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study (1997)Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries (2nd Edition) (2006)How Are Health Research Priorities Set in Low and Middle Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Published Reports (2014)Approaches, tools and methods used for setting priorities in health research in the 21st century (2015)Adapting the nominal group technique for priority setting of evidence-practice gaps in implementation science (2016)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice462 cited
  • 2012Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews53 cited
  • 2012Prevention and self-management interventions are top priorities for osteoarthritis systematic reviews34 cited
  • 2013Evidence in agenda setting: new directions for the Cochrane Collaboration30 cited
  • 2014Cochrane Airways Group reviews were prioritized for updating using a pragmatic approach17 cited
  • 2012The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics17 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work