SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
0 references·16 citing·40 second hop
Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement (2018)Working with Research Integrity—Guidance …Research Integrity Supervision Practices and Institutional Support: A Qualitative Study (2022)Research Integrity Supervisio…Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review (2022)Factors influencing the promo…Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Strengthening research integr…Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study (2021)Stakeholders' perspectives on…Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers (2021)Questionable Research Practic…Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (2021)Practices for Research Integr…Interventions for Organizational Climate and Culture in Academia: A Scoping Review (2021)Interventions for Organizatio…Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study (2021)Important Topics for Fosterin…Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study (2021)Education and training polici…Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (2021)Educating PhD Students in Res…Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Development and implementatio…What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)What Research Institutions Ca…On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations (2020)On the Willingness to Report …Collecting and characterizing existing and freely accessible research integrity educational resources (2020)Collecting and characterizing…Producción científica y licenciamiento de escuelas de medicina en el Perú (2019)Producción científica y licen…Addressing research integrity challenges: from penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care (2019)Addressing research integrity…Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’ (2016)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research (2021)Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading (2023)Power: A Radical View (1974)Basics of qualitative research (1990)Basics of Qualitative Research (1992)Denying the accusation of plagiarism: power relations at play in dictating plagiarism as academic misconduct (2022)Teaching phronesis in a research integrity course (2022)Misconduct in biomedical research: A meta-analysis and systematic review (2023)A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2010)Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences (2016)Journal of Research Administration (2023)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Qualitative Content Analysis (2014)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Perceptions of Research Integrity Climate in Hungarian Universities: Results from A Survey among Academic Researchers (2022)Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study (2023)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity (1994)Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions (2022)Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers (2023)Within-Case and Across-Case Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis (2003)Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development (2006)A Hybrid Approach to Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research: Using a Practical Example (2018)Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when? (2022)Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions (2023)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years (2024)Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research (2024)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity88 cited
  • 2021Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe67 cited
  • 2021Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on?48 cited
  • 2020On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations46 cited
  • 2021Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers45 cited
  • 2022Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review45 cited
  • 2020Collecting and characterizing existing and freely accessible research integrity educational resources41 cited
  • 2021Interventions for Organizational Climate and Culture in Academia: A Scoping Review39 cited
  • 2021Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study39 cited
  • 2019Addressing research integrity challenges: from penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care39 cited
  • 2019Producción científica y licenciamiento de escuelas de medicina en el Perú38 cited
  • 2021Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review37 cited
  • 2021Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

36 cited
  • 2021Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study31 cited
  • 2021Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts29 cited
  • 2022Research Integrity Supervision Practices and Institutional Support: A Qualitative Study29 cited