SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Critical quality evaluation of network meta-analyses in dental care
15 references·2 citing·44 second hop
Critical quality evaluation of network meta-analyses in dental care (2018)Critical quality evaluation of network me…Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis (2017)Combining randomized and non‐…Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review (2017)Characteristics and knowledge…Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar socket preservation (2016)Quality assessment of systema…Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making (2016)Continuously updated network …Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015 (2016)Bibliographic study showed im…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review (2015)An Assessment of the Methodol…A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: VI (2015)A practical approach to evide…The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement (2014)The Quality of Reporting Meth…Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review (2014)Reporting of results from net…Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review (2013)Methods used to conduct and r…Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: direct and indirect treatment comparisons. (2011)Network meta-analysis of rand…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review (2025)Updating the PRISMA reporting…Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture (2021)Critical evaluation of report…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials (2016)Psychotherapeutic Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis (2018)Development of the summary of findings table for network meta-analysis (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Perspective: Network Meta-analysis Reaches Nutrition Research: Current Status, Scientific Concepts, and Future Directions (2019)A Markov chain approach for ranking treatments in network meta‐analysis (2020)A framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) of aggregate data from randomised trials (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis (2017)Network meta‐analysis of rare events using the Mantel‐Haenszel method (2019)Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis (2022)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence? (2018)Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices after approval (2020)Network Meta-Analysis (2021)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Network meta-analysis explained (2018)Framework for the synthesis of non-randomised studies and randomised controlled trials: a guidance on conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis for healthcare decision making (2020)Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Common pitfalls and mistakes in the set-up, analysis and interpretation of results in network meta-analysis: what clinicians should look for in a published article (2017)Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2014Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review220 cited
  • 2017Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis183 cited
  • 2016Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015138 cited
  • 2014The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement105 cited
  • 2017Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review97 cited
  • 2016Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making50 cited
  • 2015An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review38 cited
  • 2013Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review33 cited
  • 2011Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: direct and indirect treatment comparisons.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2015A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: VI21 cited
  • 2016Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar socket preservation20 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture15 cited
    • 2025Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review14 cited