Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports

16 references·16 citing·37 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1992The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance12,082 cited
1997The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action8,199 cited
1992The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance.7,979 cited
2003Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS5,018 cited
1996Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process3,373 cited
2006Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL1,270 cited
2006Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method1,249 cited
2002The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy1,246 cited
1973A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems1,103 cited
2008A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications462 cited
2007Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model406 cited
2007Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan's SIP Mall industry299 cited
2005The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard as a Framework for Eco‐efficiency Analysis233 cited
2010A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality223 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2012COMMENTS ON “MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) METHODS IN ECONOMICS: AN OVERVIEW”219 cited

2015New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management197 cited

Cited by

2020Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects156 cited
2020A novel decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainty environment139 cited
2019Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry109 cited
2020Establishing a Sustainable Sports Tourism Evaluation Framework with a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Explore Potential Sports Tourism Attractions in Taiwan95 cited
2019Multidimensional evaluation of global investments on the renewable energy with the integrated fuzzy decision-making model under the hesitancy88 cited
2025A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Normalization Techniques in Holistic Sustainability Assessment for Engineering Applications80 cited
2019SDGs and airport sustainable performance: Evidence from Italy on organisational, accounting and reporting practices through financial and non-financial disclosure76 cited
2022IoT based sustainable smart waste management system evaluation using MCDM model under interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment75 cited
2021Exploring Green Marketing Orientations toward Sustainability the Hospitality Industry in the COVID-19 Pandemic58 cited
2021Evaluating Industry 4.0 Technology Application in SMEs: Using a Hybrid MCDM Approach57 cited
2023A comprehensive evaluation of a company performance using sustainability balanced scorecard based on picture fuzzy AHP54 cited
2023Assessing the application of multi-criteria decision making techniques in hospitality and tourism research: a bibliometric study54 cited
2023Sustainability in the Airports Ecosystem: A Literature Review48 cited
2019THE RELATIONSHIP OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING, ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY AND MANAGERIAL COMMITMENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE47 cited
2022Exploring sustainability balanced scorecard for performance evaluation of humanitarian organizations46 cited
2024An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainable supply chain performance evaluation from a manufacturing perspective44 cited