Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Perceived strength of forensic scientists’ reporting statements about source conclusions

16 references·12 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1952Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons2,408 cited
1952RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS1,434 cited
2016A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples415 cited
1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
1951Remarks on the Method of Paired Comparisons: I. The Least Squares Solution Assuming Equal Standard Deviations and Equal Correlations345 cited
1981Measurement in the Social Sciences328 cited
2009Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion252 cited
2011Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T102 cited
2009The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.102 cited
2016Interpreting Evidence97 cited
2009Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation96 cited
2013The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

90 cited

2016Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings85 cited

2016Blinding as a Solution to Bias : Strengthening Biomedical Science, Forensic Science, and Law83 cited

Cited by

2020Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016–201944 cited
2023The scientific reinvention of forensic science35 cited
2020Error Rates, Likelihood Ratios, and Jury Evaluation of Forensic Evidence24 cited
2020The interpretation of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals: The same evidence interpreted differently23 cited
2021Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap22 cited
2022Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system20 cited
2023Human Factors in Forensic Science20 cited
2020Mt. Everest—we are going to lose many: a survey of fingerprint examiners’ attitudes towards probabilistic reporting18 cited
2021The Bayes’ factor: the coherent measure for hypothesis confirmation18 cited
2020Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part III—Positive Predictive Value, Error Rates, and Inter‐Rater Reliability*17 cited
2022Validating strength‐of‐support conclusion scales for fingerprint, footwear, and toolmark impressions16 cited
2022The shifting narrative of uncertainty: a case for the coherent and consistent consideration of uncertainty in forensic science10 cited