How Useful is Travel-Based Multitasking? Evidence from Commuters in Portland, Oregon

Patrick A. Singleton

65 citations0/0 files storedTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Transportation Planning and Optimization Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Abstract

As research on travel-based multitasking—doing other things while traveling—becomes more common, some studies also investigate the quality or value of activity participation during travel. This idea of travel usefulness is a component of the positive utility of travel concept; understanding the benefits of travel-based multitasking is important for calculating accurate economic values trading-off travel time and other variables. This study analyzed travel usefulness and its potential determinants using a 2016 survey of about 650 commuters in the Portland, Oregon, area. Ordered logit models identified factors associated with subjective assessments of the overall usefulness of activity participation while on a recent commute trip. Around 90% of walk and bicycle commuters reported useful commutes, as did about half of transit commuters and auto passengers; however, half of auto drivers viewed their commutes as wasted time. Younger travelers, those with less frequent commutes, and people who reported “doing nothing” or more passive activities (window-gazing, daydreaming) on the trip were more likely to consider their commuting time to be a waste. Traveler perceptions were more closely associated with travel usefulness than sociodemographic characteristics. Results suggested that exercise and the physical activity benefits of walking and bicycling may be considered a useful form of travel-based multitasking. Overall, few common and traditionally productive multitasked activities appeared to be useful. Instead, commuters may be doing things more to pass the time than to make productive use of it. These findings offer implications for understanding travel behavior interventions and the potential use of autonomous vehicles.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Approaches to Social Research 2001How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations 2004Travel time use in the information age 2007The gift of travel time 2001The value of travel time savings in evaluation 2006The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain 2004When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel 2006Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: Examining its extent and assessing its potential importance

Cited by

2018Validating the Satisfaction with Travel Scale as a measure of hedonic subjective well-being for commuting in a U.S. city 2019How transport modes, the built and natural environments, and activities influence mood: A GPS smartphone app study 2020Travel-based multitasking: review of the role of digital activities and connectivity 2022Gender Difference in Perception of Value of Travel Time and Travel Mode Choice Behavior in Eight European Countries 2019Multimodal travel-based multitasking during the commute: Who does what?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.