SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship
16 references·1 citing·45 second hop
Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship (2018)Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: …What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary (2016)What guidance is available fo…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Sample size calculation for meta‐epidemiological studies (2015)Sample size calculation for m…Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination (2014)Methodological quality of sys…Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review (2012)Overviews of reviews often ha…Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Subfertility: A Comparison of Two Different Approaches (2012)Methodological Quality of Sys…Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? (2012)Cochrane and non-Cochrane sys…A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011 (2012)A Descriptive Analysis of Ove…Systematic reviews of t'ai chi: an overview (2011)Systematic reviews of t'ai ch…Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature From 1998 to 2008 (2010)Assessment of the Methodologi…Preparing a Cochrane Review (2008)Preparing a Cochrane ReviewOverviews of Reviews (2008)Overviews of ReviewsIntroduction (2008)IntroductionAnalysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Analysing Data and Undertakin…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review (2020)Are patients willing to accep…Indirect comparisons of competing interventions (2005)The overview of reviews: Unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. (2012)Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction (2017)Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool (2019)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence (2018)Introduction to Umbrella Reviews as a Useful Evidence-Based Practice (2023)Honey, I shrunk the pooled SMD! Guide to critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the Cochrane review on exercise for depression as example (2015)A guide to prospective meta-analysis (2019)Mindfulness-Based Programs for Patients With Cancer via eHealth and Mobile Health: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Quantitative Research (2020)Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review (2009)The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)LGBTQ+ in workplace: a systematic review and reconsideration (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses1,795 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2012A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011241 cited
  • 2008Overviews of Reviews218 cited
  • 2012Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review213 cited
  • 2016What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary195 cited
  • 2008Preparing a Cochrane Review130 cited
  • 2008Introduction97 cited
  • 2012Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?95 cited
  • 2011Systematic reviews of t'ai chi: an overview63 cited
  • 2010Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature From 1998 to 200855 cited
  • 2012Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Subfertility: A Comparison of Two Different Approaches42 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination
40 cited
  • 2015Sample size calculation for meta‐epidemiological studies40 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review65 cited