References

• 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
• 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
• 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
• 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
• 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
• 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
• 1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review346 cited
• 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
• 2007The ups and downs of peer review296 cited
• 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
• 1990The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review261 cited
• 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial216 cited