Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Service quality evaluation for urban rail transfer facilities with Rasch analysis

16 references·16 citing·37 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2003Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences4,492 cited
2000Item response theory for psychologists4,106 cited
1982A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring3,767 cited
2004Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences1,989 cited
1971Pedestrian planning and design1,179 cited
2003Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.911 cited
2003Service quality––developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts450 cited
2010A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view429 cited
1998Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model.381 cited
2010Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: A case study of the London Underground285 cited
2007Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the hellenic railways265 cited
2008Valuing Transit Service Quality Improvements264 cited
1998THE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME. A REVIEW OF BRITISH EVIDENCE234 cited
2000

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Seamless, accessible travel: users’ views of the public transport journey and interchange

232 cited

2009Exploring adoption difficulties in mobile banking services158 cited

2006Passengers’ Perceived Service Quality of City Buses in Taipei: Scale Development and Measurement78 cited

Cited by

2022Public utility vehicle service quality and customer satisfaction in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic103 cited
2019Improving Service Quality With the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of the Beijing Rail Transit System43 cited
2024Exploring accessibility and service quality perceptions on local public transportation in Thailand39 cited
2020Exploring the asymmetric influences of stop attributes on rider satisfaction with bus stops39 cited
2019Commuting behavior adaptation to flooding: An analysis of transit users’ choices in Metro Manila38 cited
2021An analysis of tripadvisor reviews of 127 urban rail transit networks worldwide31 cited
2023Service quality and customer satisfaction analysis among motorcycle taxi transportation in the Philippines through SERVQUAL dimensions and social exchange theory27 cited
2022Evaluating service quality of Multimodal Transportation Hub (MMTH) in Delhi, India: A gender-based perspective19 cited
2020Assessment of transport interchanges for the needs of people with reduced mobility16 cited
2022Development of Sustainable Urban Railway Service Model Using Micmac-Mactor: A Case Study in Jabodetabek Mega-Region Indonesia14 cited
2022Evaluation of wheelchair accessibility in train stations using a spatial network13 cited
2023Utilizing a machine learning ensemble to evaluate the service quality and passenger satisfaction among public transportations12 cited
2023Do users' characteristics really influence the perceived service quality of Multimodal Transportation Hub (MMTH)? An association rules mining approach11 cited
2023Modeling non-compensatory strategies on path choices in a complex urban rail transit network considering characteristics of transfer passengers and trips11 cited
2025Study on travel choice behavior of medium and long distance intercity passengers in the context of air-rail competition11 cited
2022Exploring the Group Difference in the Nonlinear Relationship between Commuting Satisfaction and Commuting Time10 cited