SME ambidexterity during economic recessions: the role of managerial external capabilities

Henar Alcalde‐Heras · Cristina Iturrioz Landart · Cristina Aragón Amonarriz

71 citations0/0 files storedManagement Decision

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Firm Innovation and Growth Business Strategy and Innovation

Abstract

Purpose Most literature on ambidexterity has focused on large firms and on the influence of internal issues in this strategy, that is, organizational structures, top management integration, or internal knowledge management processes (Lutbatkinet al., 2006; Chang et al., 2011; Lee and Huang, 2012). The purpose of this paper is to assess small- to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)’ ambidexterity strategies during economic recession periods in comparison with those of large firms and identify the managerial external capabilities which are associated with the development of SMEs’ ambidexterity. Design/methodology/approach A multinomial logit model and a probit model are proposed and tested using data collected from 2,150 Spanish firms during the period of 2009-2013. Findings The data analysis reveals that SMEs develop more ambidextrous innovation strategies in recession periods than larger firms do. Moreover, two managerial external capabilities have been identified as drivers of SMEs’ ambidextrous behavior in crisis periods: first, the capability of top management to anticipate scenarios; and second, the capacity to acquire adequate external resources through co-operation. Practical implications The results show that SME managers wanting to develop ambidextrous strategies in recession periods have to forecast scenarios in terms of innovation difficulties and strengthen their resources through co-operation. Implementation of public policy is encouraged to support these capabilities, thus enhancing SME sustainability in uncertain contexts. Originality/value Prior studies have paid little attention to the role of external capabilities. Although their role was revealed as a relevant dimension in the study of SME ambidexterity in adverse contexts by Caoet al.(2010), it remained underexplored. This paper aims to fill this gap.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 71 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage 2004Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage 1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 1991Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning 1983An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.1993The myopia of learning 2005Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms 1989Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments

Cited by

2023What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges 2022Innovative Business Strategies in the Face of COVID-19: An Approach to Open Innovation of SMEs in the Sonora Region of Mexico 2023Exploring the impact of collaboration on eco-innovation in SMEs: a contribution to the business modes of innovation framework 2019Entrepreneurial Orientation in Micro and Small Enterprises of Traditional Food Centers in Bandung, West Java 2023Going Digital for SMES: Adapting Business Model and Seizing Opportunities to Achieve Sustainable Business Performance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.