Where Does Teaching Multiperspectivity in History Education Begin and End? An Analysis of the Uses of Temporality

Abstract

This study reports five Dutch expert history teachers’ approaches to multiperspectivity in lessons on three topics varying in moral sensitivity (i.e., the Dutch Revolt, Slavery, and the Holocaust) and their underlying considerations for addressing subjects’ perspectives in different temporal layers. The lessons were observed and videorecorded, and the teachers were interviewed. Lessons were analyzed using a theoretical framework in which three different temporal layers of perspectives were distinguished, each with its own educational function. Teachers addressed multiple temporal layers and functions of multiperspectivity in almost all of their lessons. However, teachers’ focus on temporal layers and function differed between lessons. Four categories of considerations for or against introducing specific subjects’ perspectives were found: functional, moral, pedagogical, and practical. Moreover, teachers engaged in “normative balancing,” meaning that not all perspectives were perceived as equally valid or politically desirable, showing where multiperspectivity ends.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 103 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.