SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials
12 references·11 citing·44 second hop
Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials (2018)Outcome reporting discrepancies between t…Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations (2018)Promoting public access to cl…The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand? (2015)The evidence from systematic …The CONSORT Statement: Application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials (2015)The CONSORT Statement: Applic…Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals? (2015)Outcome Discrepancies and Sel…Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration (2015)Is Mandatory Prospective Tria…The Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Orthodontics (2014)The Reporting Quality of Rand…Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals (2013)Registration Rates, Adequacy …Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Reports in Surgery Journals (2013)Comparison of Randomized Cont…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Undisclosed Changes in Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study (2009)Undisclosed Changes in Outcom…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Time to publication for results of clinical trials (2024)Time to publication for resul…Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study (2024)Selective outcome reporting a…Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses (2023)Estimating the prevalence of …Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research (2022)Selective outcome reporting i…Selective outcome reporting bias is highly prevalent in randomized clinical trials of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (2022)Selective outcome reporting b…Scoping reviews in orthodontics: are they justified? (2022)Scoping reviews in orthodonti…Publication bias in randomized controlled trials in dentistry. What factors affect statistical significance of outcomes? (2022)Publication bias in randomize…Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in Endodontic Research: Evidence over a 5‐year period (2021)Trial registration and select…Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials (2021)Selective outcome reporting i…Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses (2021)Estimating the prevalence of …Selective outcome reporting in randomized clinical trials of dental implants (2019)Selective outcome reporting i…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts presented at European Orthodontic Society congresses (2015)The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal (2017)Current trends in orthodontic journals listed in Journal Citation Reports. A bibliometric study (2019)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)A systematic review of trial registration and selective outcome reporting in psychotherapy randomized controlled trials (2016)Improving transparency and reproducibility through registration: The status of intervention trials published in clinical psychology journals. (2016)Prospective registration and reporting of trial number in randomised clinical trials: global cross sectional study of the adoption of ICMJE and Declaration of Helsinki recommendations (2020)Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research (2018)Comparison of Clinical Trial Changes in Primary Outcome and Reported Intervention Effect Size Between Trial Registration and Publication (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Reporting quality of randomised controlled trials published in prosthodontic and implantology journals (2015)Hawthorne effect reporting in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: truth or myth? Blessing or curse? (2017)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Reporting of Adverse Events in Surgical Trials: Critical Appraisal of Current Practice (2014)Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review (2015)A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis (2019)Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review (2020)SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2015Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration99 cited
  • 2013Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals92 cited
  • 2018Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations83 cited
  • 2015Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?80 cited
  • 2014The Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Orthodontics70 cited
  • 2015The CONSORT Statement: Application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials52 cited
  • 2013Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Reports in Surgery Journals50 cited
  • 2009Undisclosed Changes in Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study50 cited
  • 2015The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand?46 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Selective outcome reporting in randomized clinical trials of dental implants
35 cited
  • 2023Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses33 cited
  • 2024Time to publication for results of clinical trials31 cited
  • 2021Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials24 cited
  • 2021Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses18 cited
  • 2021Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in Endodontic Research: Evidence over a 5‐year period15 cited
  • 2022Selective outcome reporting bias is highly prevalent in randomized clinical trials of nonsurgical periodontal therapy14 cited
  • 2022Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research13 cited
  • 2022Publication bias in randomized controlled trials in dentistry. What factors affect statistical significance of outcomes?12 cited
  • 2024Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study10 cited
  • 2022Scoping reviews in orthodontics: are they justified?9 cited