SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Distal Radial Fracture Treatment
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Distal Radial Fracture Treatment (2018)Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias i…Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013 (2015)Trends in global clinical tri…Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Recommendations for the condu…Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes (2012)Driving up the Quality and Re…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Outcome reporting bias in ran…Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta‐analysis (2004)Identification and impact of …Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…Underreporting research is scientific misconduct (1990)Underreporting research is sc…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results (2017)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)The AASPIRE practice-based guidelines for the inclusion of autistic adults in research as co-researchers and study participants (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2015Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals739 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited
  • 2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
  • 1990Underreporting research is scientific misconduct304 cited
  • 2012Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

288 cited
  • 2015Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013227 cited
  • 2004Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta‐analysis130 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.