SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Infants’ evaluation of prosocial and antisocial agents: A meta-analysis.
16 references·16 citing·32 second hopsampled
Infants’ evaluation of prosocial and antisocial agents: A meta-analysis. (2018)Infants’ evaluation of prosocial and anti…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisIntroduction to Meta-Analysis (2020)Introduction to Meta-AnalysisThe New Statistics (2013)The New StatisticsPower failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…Do Infants Have a Sense of Fairness? (2012)Do Infants Have a Sense of Fa…Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis (2011)Understanding the New Statist…Fairness Expectations and Altruistic Sharing in 15-Month-Old Human Infants (2011)Fairness Expectations and Alt…Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research (2011)Applied Meta-Analysis for Soc…Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others (2010)Young infants prefer prosocia…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…Social evaluation by preverbal infants (2007)Social evaluation by preverba…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funne…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Infants’ Social Evaluation of Helpers and Hinderers: A Large‐Scale, Multi‐Lab, Coordinated Replication Study (2024)Infants’ Social Evaluation of…The violation-of-expectation paradigm: A conceptual overview. (2023)The violation-of-expectation …From Deep Learning to Rational Machines (2023)From Deep Learning to Rationa…Children's Acquisition and Application of Norms (2023)Children's Acquisition and Ap…Toddlers’ social evaluations of agents who act on false beliefs (2022)Toddlers’ social evaluations …Third-party punishment by preverbal infants (2022)Third-party punishment by pre…Simplicity and validity in infant research (2022)Simplicity and validity in in…Infants’ intention-based evaluations of distributive actions (2022)Infants’ intention-based eval…Adopted Utility Calculus: Origins of a Concept of Social Affiliation (2022)Adopted Utility Calculus: Ori…The emergence of empathy: A developmental neuroscience perspective (2021)The emergence of empathy: A d…Mechanisms of social evaluation in infancy: A preregistered exploration of infants’ eye‐movement and pupillary responses to prosocial and antisocial events (2021)Mechanisms of social evaluati…Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al . (2007) (2020)Do 15-month-old infants prefe…Why do infants help? A simple action reveals a complex phenomenon (2019)Why do infants help? A simple…The developmental origins of social hierarchy: how infants and young children mentally represent and respond to power and status (2019)The developmental origins of …Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force (2018)Toddlers prefer those who win…Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies (2018)Infants distinguish between l…Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come (1996)Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología (2013)Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) (2015)Sample Size Justification (2022)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2013The New Statistics3,182 cited
  • 2011Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis2,022 cited
  • 2007Social evaluation by preverbal infants1,566 cited
  • 2011Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research1,303 cited
  • 2020Introduction to Meta-Analysis1,215 cited
  • 2012Do Infants Have a Sense of Fairness?636 cited
  • 2010Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others609 cited
  • 2011Fairness Expectations and Altruistic Sharing in 15-Month-Old Human Infants

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

579 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force155 cited
  • 2021The emergence of empathy: A developmental neuroscience perspective134 cited
  • 2018Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies128 cited
  • 2023The violation-of-expectation paradigm: A conceptual overview.127 cited
  • 2020Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al . (2007)92 cited
  • 2022Adopted Utility Calculus: Origins of a Concept of Social Affiliation88 cited
  • 2022Third-party punishment by preverbal infants72 cited
  • 2019The developmental origins of social hierarchy: how infants and young children mentally represent and respond to power and status66 cited
  • 2022Toddlers’ social evaluations of agents who act on false beliefs60 cited
  • 2019Why do infants help? A simple action reveals a complex phenomenon55 cited
  • 2022Infants’ intention-based evaluations of distributive actions54 cited
  • 2022Simplicity and validity in infant research53 cited
  • 2021Mechanisms of social evaluation in infancy: A preregistered exploration of infants’ eye‐movement and pupillary responses to prosocial and antisocial events52 cited
  • 2023From Deep Learning to Rational Machines49 cited
  • 2024Infants’ Social Evaluation of Helpers and Hinderers: A Large‐Scale, Multi‐Lab, Coordinated Replication Study46 cited
  • 2023Children's Acquisition and Application of Norms45 cited