SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Introduction to Meta-Analysis · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleIntroduction to Meta-Analysis

M. Borenstein2020

Article2020

Introduction to Meta-Analysis

M. Borenstein · L.V. Hedges · J.P.T. Higgins · Hannah R. Rothstein · Assem Ben Van Den

1,215 citations·0/0 files stored·International Coaching Psychology Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Coaching Methods and Impact Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,215 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2020A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health 2021Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory 2020Customer engagement in social media: a framework and meta-analysis 2022The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta‐analytic evaluation of recent meta‐analyses 2017Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis.2020The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: a meta-analysis 2019Mindfulness‐based interventions for psychological and physical health outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials 2020Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies

Details

Year2020

Typearticle

Published2020-01-01

VenueInternational Coaching Psychology Review

ISSN-L1750-2764

Languageen

Citations1,215

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.121

openalex_workW4320164719

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.