SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States
6 references·0 citing·29 second hop
Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States (2018)Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relat…Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands (2015)Accounting for Impact? The Jo…The Tyranny of Tradition: How information paradigms limit librarians’ teaching and student scholarship (2013)The Tyranny of Tradition: How…Editorial: Assessing Academic Researchers (2012)Editorial: Assessing Academic…Metrics: Do metrics matter? (2010)Metrics: Do metrics matter?Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas† (2006)Citation indexes for science.…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Networks of Scientific PapersLittle Science, Big Science (1963)New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing (1963)Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing (1965)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2013)College Libraries and Chemical Education (1927)Characteristics of the Research Literature Used by Chemists and Physicists in the United States (1949)Citation indexes for scientific literature? (1955)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda (2020)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1998)Epistemic Cultures (1999)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)The Sources of a Science of Education. (1930)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)The Politics of Education (1985)Researching Bears Ears: reference practice for civic engagement (2020)The Enlightenment of Peer Review (2020)On the use of the h-index in evaluating chemical research (2013)Using Citation Indexes, Citation Searching, and Bibliometrics To Improve Chemistry Scholarship, Research, and Administration (2015)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (2012)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1965Networks of Scientific Papers3,205 cited
  • 2006Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas†539 cited
  • 2010Metrics: Do metrics matter?290 cited
  • 2015Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands131 cited
  • 2012Editorial: Assessing Academic Researchers17 cited
  • 2013The Tyranny of Tradition: How information paradigms limit librarians’ teaching and student scholarship4 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work