SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preprints could promote confusion and distortion
0 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Preprints could promote confusion and distortion (2018)Preprints could promote confusion and dis…PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication (2023)PreprintMatch: A tool for pre…Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Tracking changes between prep…Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists’ use and perception of preprints (2022)Science in motion: A qualitat…Robustness of evidence reported in preprints during peer review (2022)Robustness of evidence report…Preprints (2022)PreprintsCaution, Preprint! Brief Explanations Allow Nonscientists to Differentiate Between Preprints and Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles (2022)Caution, Preprint! Brief Expl…Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication (2021)Preprints: Their Evolving Rol…Improving energy research practices: guidance for transparency, reproducibility and quality (2021)Improving energy research pra…The rise of preprints and their value in social sciences and humanities (2020)The rise of preprints and the…Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences (2020)Technical and social issues i…Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations (2020)Silently withdrawn or retract…Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)Open Science Saves Lives: Les…Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of open science (2019)Science as behaviour: Using a…Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Preprints and Scholarly Commu…Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet‐era transformation of scholarly communications (2019)Is open access affordable? Wh…In praise of preprints (2019)In praise of preprints“Do We Believe in TripAdvisor?” Examining Credibility Perceptions and Online Travelers’ Attitude toward Using User-Generated Content (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication (2019)The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models (2020)Can I afford to publish? A dilemma for African scholars (2021)Diffusion of innovations (2003)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Preprints as accelerator of scholarly communication: An empirical analysis in Mathematics (2020)Real-Time Bibliometrics: Dimensions as a Resource for Analyzing Aspects of COVID-19 (2021)Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors (2022)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)A Guide to Posting and Managing Preprints (2021)The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science (2020)Group-based acceptance and commitment therapy interventions for improving general distress and work-related distress in healthcare professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Open Science por defecto. La nueva normalidad para la investigación (2021)The Science of Open (Communication) Science: Toward an Evidence-Driven Understanding of Quality Criteria in Communication Research (2021)The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2024)Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis (2014)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Will COVID-19 result in a giant step backwards for women in academic science? (2021)Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles (2022)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Downstream retraction of preprinted research in the life and medical sciences (2022)Characterization of Comments About bioRxiv and medRxiv Preprints (2023)lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling (2012)Some Consequences of Having Too Little (2012)Framing COVID-19 Preprint Research as Uncertain: A Mixed-Method Study of Public Reactions (2023)Evaluating the predictive capacity of ChatGPT for academic peer review outcomes across multiple platforms (2025)Measuring agreement in method comparison studies (1999)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake in people living with HIV (2023)The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Epistemic injustice in academic global health (2021)Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed journal articles of COVID-19 trials (2024)Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2022Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic95 cited
  • 2019Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of open science81 cited
  • 2019Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers79 cited
  • 2019Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet‐era transformation of scholarly communications78 cited
  • 2020Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic57 cited
  • 2020Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences50 cited
  • 2023PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication49 cited
  • 2022Robustness of evidence reported in preprints during peer review43 cited
  • 2022Caution, Preprint! Brief Explanations Allow Nonscientists to Differentiate Between Preprints and Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles38 cited
  • 2022Preprints37 cited
  • 2022Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists’ use and perception of preprints32 cited
  • 2020The rise of preprints and their value in social sciences and humanities31 cited
  • 2021Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication30 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019In praise of preprints29 cited
  • 2020Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations28 cited
  • 2021Improving energy research practices: guidance for transparency, reproducibility and quality28 cited