Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance

Art R. P. J. Dewulf · Robbert G. Biesbroek

108 citations0/0 files storedPolicy and Society

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Risk Perception and Management Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

Abstract

ABSTRACT Governing complex environmental issues involves intensive interaction between public and private actors. These governance processes are fraught with uncertainties about, for example, the current state of environmental affairs, the relevant set of decision alternatives, the reactions of other actors to proposed solutions or the future developments likely to affect an issue. Uncertainty comes in different shapes and sizes and different strands in the literature, which has placed emphasis either on the substance of the issue (e.g. in environmental sciences) or on the decision-making process (e.g. policy sciences). In this paper, we bring together these different strands of literature on uncertainty to present a novel analytical framework. We build on the argument that the nature of uncertainty consists of three types: epistemic uncertainty (involving the lack of knowledge about a particular system), ontological uncertainty (irreducible unpredictability due to inherently complex system behavior) and ambiguity (conflicts between fundamentally different frames about the issue at hand). Scholars have also argued the importance of differentiating between three different objects of uncertainty: substantive uncertainty (uncertainty about the content of decisions or policy issues), strategic uncertainty (uncertainty about the actions of other actors in the strategic game of decision-making) and institutional uncertainty (uncertainty about the rules of the game in decision-making). The framework is useful for analyzing and addressing the nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making. Better understanding of the range of uncertainties is crucial to design more robust policies and governance arrangements and to deal with wicked environmental problems.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 108 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics 2003Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction 2010A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action Presidential Address, American political Science Association, 1997 2003Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction 1992Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible 2003Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support 2000INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION WITHOUT SANCTIONS: THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY'S RESPONSIBLE CARE PROGRAM.1990Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy

Cited by

2021Designing policy mixes for emerging wicked problems. The case of pharmaceutical residues in freshwaters 2020Governing long-term policy problems: Dilemmas and strategies at a Dutch water authority 2023Operationalizing ambiguity in sustainability science: embracing the elephant in the room 2022Results‐based management of wicked problems? Indicators and comparative evidence from Latin America 2025

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.